劇情縱覽
可潔自接任高院檢察官之后,即以女性代言人自稱,舉凡所有的女性案件,在她的手中,大都能得到法律上公正的處理。安琪自外與男友吵架歸家,在回家途中,碰到一個精神失常的流浪漢,流浪漢借機向她搭訕,令她大皺眉頭,憤而直駛地下道,不料竟遭人攻擊,并以蟲蟻爬行其身、嗅吻其高跟鞋后,再予以強J
可潔自接任高院檢察官之后,即以女性代言人自稱,舉凡所有的女性案件,在她的手中,大都能得到法律上公正的處理。安琪自外與男友吵架歸家,在回家途中,碰到一個精神失常的流浪漢,流浪漢借機向她搭訕,令她大皺眉頭,憤而直駛地下道,不料竟遭人攻擊,并以蟲蟻爬行其身、嗅吻其高跟鞋后,再予以強J
一名叫達爾的走失男孩被小鎮(zhèn)人們發(fā)現(xiàn),由于沒人認領(lǐng),他被帶到福利院。經(jīng)過檢查,醫(yī)生發(fā)現(xiàn)他身體各項機能正常,而且智商很高,只是失去了一部分的記憶?! ∵_爾被安排暫時居住在安迪家。安迪和妻子喬依斯一直希望能夠領(lǐng)養(yǎng)一個孩子,達爾的到來令他們異常興奮。在相處的過程中,達爾和鄰居家的小男孩特塔成為了非常要好的朋友,他們一起上學(xué)、一起玩耍、一起為安迪的棒球隊贏得了勝利,大家都覺得達爾是個非常聰明而且惹人喜愛的男孩?! 『鋈挥幸惶?,兩個自稱是達爾父母的人來接走了達爾,這令安迪全家和特塔非常傷心。達爾也對他們產(chǎn)生了深厚的感情,戀戀不舍地離開了安迪家?! ∈聦嵣线_爾是一個在大腦中被植入芯片的機器人,但他現(xiàn)在具備了一個正常孩子的一切生理機能。來接他的也并非他的父母,而是制造他的博士。博士被達爾和安迪他們的深厚情感所感動,他希望達爾能像正常孩子一樣生活,但國家的高級官員卻要求摧毀達爾。博士在同事的配合下,將達爾帶出試驗基地,遭到警察的追擊,途中博士為了掩護達爾中彈身亡?! ∵_爾潛入空軍基地,開著戰(zhàn)斗機向安迪家的方向飛去??哲娀氐孛孢b控飛機在飛行過程中自動摧毀,達爾彈出飛機,降落在安迪家旁邊的湖中。達爾終于回到了屬于他的“家”中。
本片以紀實風(fēng)格再現(xiàn)了1938年到1945年抗日聯(lián)軍第六軍被服廠女兵,傷兵醫(yī)院傷兵組成的留守團在主力部隊西征后堅持在老游擊區(qū)牽制敵人主力,于重重圍剿中突圍,進入蘇聯(lián)整訓(xùn),整編為抗聯(lián)第88教導(dǎo)旅打回東北的真實故事?! ∮捌高^12歲女戰(zhàn)士李童的視角,塑造了耿團長、裴大姐、白連長、金玉希、李亦奇等一批普通抗聯(lián)男女戰(zhàn)士在突圍中拼死互相保護,犧牲、被俘、最終生還的殘酷歷程?! ”酒木幾宰詈笠粋€離世的抗聯(lián)女戰(zhàn)士李敏撰寫的回憶錄?! ∵@是第一次用電影方式講述了抗聯(lián)后期從突圍到整編為教導(dǎo)旅再到打回東北的全過程。
位于韓國某山區(qū)的智翼村,是一座號稱零犯罪村的旅游勝地。每到假期或周末,全國各地的游客云集于此,享受難得的快樂生活。為了吸引更多的游客,智翼村相繼開發(fā)了高爾夫球場合周末農(nóng)場,為此砍伐了大量的原始叢林。野生動物的生存環(huán)境遭到破壞,加上偷獵者的侵擾,野豬數(shù)量急劇減少。為了生存,野豬開始挖掘人類的墳?zāi)?,啃噬尸體,由此對人肉產(chǎn)生了濃厚的興趣?! ∧程?,村中一名獵人孫女的尸體被人發(fā)現(xiàn),她的尸體破碎不堪,只留下頭顱。經(jīng)法醫(yī)鑒定和老獵人的觀察,這起慘案系一頭是人野豬所為。在此之后,武裝精良的獵人們來到智翼村,人獸的戰(zhàn)爭漸次白熱化……
Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.