劇情簡介
Jin感到生活已經(jīng)乏味，想要逃離，正好愛上了新來的同伴Du-san，想要和他一起離開，但是Du-san決定留在這兒。
為你推薦
六六大順
李孟武,肖軼,安悅溪,王喳喳,黃一飛,井凌瀟,畢童,提愛民瀕臨破產(chǎn)的老板李大順（李孟武 飾）為逆轉(zhuǎn)絕境，與死磕項目的技術(shù)宅李譜（肖軼 飾）踏上尋“小分子水”之路，臨時搭擋的組合囧況百出，還沒發(fā)車就透露著熱鬧，并偶遇了身世可憐的少年六六……
最后一槍2025
Lham Somphol Rungphanit,薩里卡·塞思蘇帕,帕塔納·埃桑固Petch想擺脫殺手生涯，但逃離過去談何容易？在愛情、忠誠與復(fù)仇之間掙扎，他被迫接下最后一單。每一槍響起，賭注都在升級。他的未來與自由，全系于最后一顆子彈。 “終極任務(wù)，致命一槍，無路可退?！?/p>
梵蒂岡錄像帶
杰曼·翰蘇,凱瑟琳·羅伯特森,邁克爾·佩納,多格雷·斯科特,邁克爾·帕爾,約翰·帕特里克·阿梅多利,丹尼爾·伯哈特,奧利維亞·泰勒·達(dá)德利,彼得·安德森,卡斯·安瓦爾,布魯諾·岡恩,肯特·紹克內(nèi)克,梅爾·法爾,Noemi Gonzalez,泰米娜·森尼安吉拉是27歲的普通女孩，生活平淡無奇。有天，她意外發(fā)現(xiàn)與自己親近的人都死于非命。梵蒂岡教徒得知此事后，對安吉拉展開了一系列調(diào)查。可這次調(diào)查卻引出了安吉拉背后古老的邪惡力量……
縱橫四海
周潤發(fā),張國榮,鐘楚紅,朱江,曾江,胡楓,唐寧,鄧一君砵仔糕（周潤發(fā) 飾）、阿占（張國榮 飾）和紅豆（鐘楚紅 飾）均是孤兒，在養(yǎng)父（曾江 飾）栽培下成為國際大盜。長大后成了幫他賺錢的藝術(shù)品大盜，而三人同時又認(rèn)了警察（朱江 飾）為干爹。法國巴黎博物館內(nèi)，名畫《赫林之女仆》被人盜走。與此同時，阿海、阿占和紅豆三人以敏捷身手盜得另一幅名畫，在與法國大哥交易時得知名畫《赫林之女仆》在妖氣重重的古堡內(nèi)，他們在曾江安排下成功地盜取此畫之后，反被集團(tuán)原兇曾江與法國大哥合謀設(shè)下陷阱，派人追殺滅口。阿海駕車與殺手快艇相撞……三人失散，數(shù)年后，他們在香港重聚，阿海“癱瘓”住在朱江家里，阿占和紅豆已經(jīng)結(jié)婚了。曾江又逼他們?nèi)ネ诞嫛?/p>
掏出你的手帕
熱拉爾·德帕迪約,卡洛埃·勞拉,帕特里克·迪瓦爾,米歇爾·塞羅爾,埃萊奧諾雷·希爾特這是一位始終以兩性關(guān)系、婚姻道德為主題的電影作者，這部獲得奧斯卡最佳外語片的《掏出你的手帕》也不在例外。關(guān)于影片，布里耶是這樣解釋的：“表面上看這是一部怪誕的電影，但實際上這是一部徹底顛倒道德標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的片子，不過表現(xiàn)得比較委婉且具有魅力。如果仔細(xì)觀察就可以看出，所有的道德價值都被顛倒了，所有的道德傳統(tǒng)都被拋到了一邊。人物的思想狀態(tài)正處于一種極端混亂的時期，今天你也許還不會把妻子當(dāng)作禮物送給別人，但也許將來你就可以做到了?！?/p>
學(xué)前班
喬什·杜哈明,查麗蒂·維克菲爾德,詹姆斯·科茲莫,安東尼婭·托馬斯,邁克爾·索恰,費奈拉·伍爾加兩位堅定的父親展開一場滑稽的爭奪，爭奪讓孩子進(jìn)入一所精英幼兒園，最終升級為一場荒誕的競爭，結(jié)果出乎意料。
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.