誤殺瞞天記

評分：6.1 播放：35萬 更新：2026-04-22

維杰（阿賈耶·德烏干 Ajay Devgan 飾）和妻子娜蒂尼（施芮婭·薩蘭 Shreya 飾）結(jié)婚多年，將兩個女兒安久（伊西塔·杜塔 Ishita Dutta 飾）和安努（莫倫諾·賈達夫 Mrunal Jadhav 飾）撫養(yǎng)長大，一家人過著寧靜的生活，平淡之中自有真味 。某日，安久去參加野營，結(jié)識了名為薩姆（Rishabh Chaddha 飾）的男生，此時的她并不知道的是，這位看上去文質(zhì)彬彬的男孩，會徹底粉碎她的生活。 撕下了偽善面具的薩姆竟然想要強暴安久，在激烈的掙扎反抗之中，安久失手殺死薩姆。維杰決定挺身而出保護他無辜的家人，自小熱愛看電影的他利用從電影里學到的知識對薩姆的尸體進行了處理和掩埋，但警察的來訪讓這個家庭再一次陷入了危機之中。

影片推薦

同類精選

影視排行

開麥了嗎？

威爾·阿奈特,布萊德利·庫珀,塞倫·希德,勞拉·鄧恩,艾米·塞德麗絲,西恩·海耶斯,克斯汀·埃伯索爾,斯萬米·薩姆派奧,安德拉·戴,佩頓·曼寧,加布·法齊奧,迪倫·比克爾,喬丹·詹森,Scott Icenogle,湯姆·約翰遜,Chloe Radcliffe,德里克·蓋恩斯,蘭登·威爾森,Reggie Conquest,Seyler Fox

　　經(jīng)過多年的共同生活，亞歷克斯和苔絲最終和平地結(jié)束了他們的婚姻，也由此開啟了一個尷尬的階段：他們開始摸索如何在各自獨立生活的同時，撫養(yǎng)兩個兒子，并維持彼此的友誼。亞歷克斯發(fā)現(xiàn)了自己新的愛好，投身于喜劇表演之中，而苔絲則開始直面自己為家庭做出的犧牲。本片根據(jù)英國著名喜劇演員約翰·畢曉普的人生經(jīng)歷改編。

愚者的身份

北村匠海,綾野剛,林裕太,山下美月,矢本悠馬,木南晴夏

在社交網(wǎng)絡上偽裝女性，用話術誘騙無親無故的男性套取個人信息，從事戶籍買賣的拓也（北村匠海 飾）和守（林裕太 飾），自幼在惡劣環(huán)境中長大，不知不覺已成為黑道組織的爪牙。                                                                      　　盡管涉足灰色產(chǎn)業(yè)，這兩個時常插科打諢的年輕人，本質(zhì)上只是普通的都市青年，彼此相依為命。當拓也在黑道引路人、猶如兄長般存在的梶谷（綾野剛 飾）的協(xié)助下，決心與守一同逃離這個黑暗世界時，等待他們的卻是......

奪魂醫(yī)生

Andrew Prine,Jason London,Carlos Lauchu

　　在一個肅殺的夜晚，滿身傷痕的女孩西恩娜（艾麗森·蘭格 Allison Lange 飾）跌跌撞撞沖入公路。她隨即被送往醫(yī)院，在探員贊恩（詹森·倫敦 Jason London 飾）的詢問下，驚魂未定的西恩娜終于說出了那段恐怖經(jīng)歷?！　芍芮?，她和同在醫(yī)科大學念書的好友斯科特（B.J. Britt 飾）、杰森（尼克·霍爾莫斯 Nick Holmes 飾）、本（C.J. Thomason 飾）、夏儂等人結(jié)伴外出游玩。他們駐留在一所古堡，看似一切充滿了刺激和樂趣，但是這份無上喜悅很快便蒙上一層陰影。在他們身后，似乎有一個手執(zhí)手術刀的奪命醫(yī)生蠢蠢欲動，死神的腳步越來越近。這群躊躇滿志的未來醫(yī)生，儼然成為了手術臺上的致命犧牲品……

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.